5 thoughts on “How much is the current national standard of raw milk and internal control standards?”
Marian
Recently, there is an article on China's dairy industry issues that have caused discussions, and once again put out the "world lowest" milk standard problem that China is still being implemented. The national standards that are currently implemented in China were released in 2010. Due to the low specifications of the two key indicators of the total protein and colonies, it is even lower than the national standard of the old breast milk in 1986. Therefore, since the release of 10 years, it has been questioned by the industry and consumers. Among them, the indicator of the protein specifies ≥ 2.8 (G/100G), and the verification method refers to the GB 5009.5, the total number of colonies should be ≤/g (ml), and the test method refers to GB 4789.2. The total number of colonies is an indicator for measuring the safety of milk, and too high will constitute a hidden safety hazard. The national standard of Chinese milk is far lower than other countries on this indicator. The total number of raw cattle lactococcus colonies in other countries is less than 100,000/ml, of which Australia and New Zealand colonies have a total of 25,000/ml. Many dairy companies have formulated higher corporate standards on top of the national standards, referring to the standards of other countries. The authoritative figures of Dairy Deng Rongzhen told the reporter of "Finance and Economics", "The development of an industry and one type of products is to meet the needs of markets and consumers. The standard level of advanced countries is equivalent. " , Song Kungang, Honorary Chairman of the Dairy Association, believes that in fact, the new national standard has not affected the development of the industry. Although the national dairy industry standards are indeed the lowest standards in the world, consumers should question, but this standard will not restrict the factory's milk, and the interests of consumers will not be affected. , at the policy level, the formulation of the new national target has not yet been determined. However, the first discussion draft of the new national target has been released and began to solicit opinions from the society. One of the highlights in the new national standard is to implement the standard of milk grade, that is, distinguish the high -quality milk sources in the original milk from the general milk source, and eventually form differentiated dairy products in the market, which can meet the different needs of consumers. It can also protect consumers' right to know, and change the situation of "good milk cannot sell good prices".
About 0.3g/100g, the national standard of raw milk is 2.8G/100G, and the control standards in the enterprise are about 2.5g/100g. However It is hoped that the standards can be improved in the future, and domestic milk standards must move closer to international standards.
The current national standards of raw milk are generally higher than the control standards in the enterprise. The total number of raw cowbacter colonies in other countries is less than 100,000/ml. The total number of colonies in Australia and New Zealand is 25,000/ml. ≥ 2.8 (G/100G), is far lower than other countries
At present, the national standards of milk implemented in China were released in 2010. Due to the low specifications of the two key indicators of the total number of protein and colonies, even less than the old moderate milk country standard in 1986. Security risks. The national standard of Chinese milk is far lower than other countries on this indicator. It is 2 million/ml. The total number of raw cowhide colonies in other countries is less than 100,000/ml. 10,000/ml.
The current national standards of raw breasts are almost the same as in -enterprise control standards. Basically, the two standards are very close, but in order to improve the quality of the product, some companies often strictly control it on the standard!
Recently, there is an article on China's dairy industry issues that have caused discussions, and once again put out the "world lowest" milk standard problem that China is still being implemented.
The national standards that are currently implemented in China were released in 2010. Due to the low specifications of the two key indicators of the total protein and colonies, it is even lower than the national standard of the old breast milk in 1986. Therefore, since the release of 10 years, it has been questioned by the industry and consumers. Among them, the indicator of the protein specifies ≥ 2.8 (G/100G), and the verification method refers to the GB 5009.5, the total number of colonies should be ≤/g (ml), and the test method refers to GB 4789.2. The total number of colonies is an indicator for measuring the safety of milk, and too high will constitute a hidden safety hazard. The national standard of Chinese milk is far lower than other countries on this indicator.
The total number of raw cattle lactococcus colonies in other countries is less than 100,000/ml, of which Australia and New Zealand colonies have a total of 25,000/ml. Many dairy companies have formulated higher corporate standards on top of the national standards, referring to the standards of other countries.
The authoritative figures of Dairy Deng Rongzhen told the reporter of "Finance and Economics", "The development of an industry and one type of products is to meet the needs of markets and consumers. The standard level of advanced countries is equivalent. "
, Song Kungang, Honorary Chairman of the Dairy Association, believes that in fact, the new national standard has not affected the development of the industry. Although the national dairy industry standards are indeed the lowest standards in the world, consumers should question, but this standard will not restrict the factory's milk, and the interests of consumers will not be affected.
, at the policy level, the formulation of the new national target has not yet been determined. However, the first discussion draft of the new national target has been released and began to solicit opinions from the society. One of the highlights in the new national standard is to implement the standard of milk grade, that is, distinguish the high -quality milk sources in the original milk from the general milk source, and eventually form differentiated dairy products in the market, which can meet the different needs of consumers. It can also protect consumers' right to know, and change the situation of "good milk cannot sell good prices".
About 0.3g/100g, the national standard of raw milk is 2.8G/100G, and the control standards in the enterprise are about 2.5g/100g. However It is hoped that the standards can be improved in the future, and domestic milk standards must move closer to international standards.
The current national standards of raw milk are generally higher than the control standards in the enterprise. The total number of raw cowbacter colonies in other countries is less than 100,000/ml. The total number of colonies in Australia and New Zealand is 25,000/ml. ≥ 2.8 (G/100G), is far lower than other countries
At present, the national standards of milk implemented in China were released in 2010. Due to the low specifications of the two key indicators of the total number of protein and colonies, even less than the old moderate milk country standard in 1986. Security risks. The national standard of Chinese milk is far lower than other countries on this indicator. It is 2 million/ml. The total number of raw cowhide colonies in other countries is less than 100,000/ml. 10,000/ml.
The current national standards of raw breasts are almost the same as in -enterprise control standards. Basically, the two standards are very close, but in order to improve the quality of the product, some companies often strictly control it on the standard!